Mothering a gift of God: How Edith Stein’s theology of education opposes the technocratic paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51743/cpe.508Keywords:
Edith Stein, education, pedagogy, technocratic paradigm, technology ethicsAbstract
As the field of education is increasingly influenced by AI technologies, it becomes difficult to ascertain whether teaching methods are adequately cultivating human capacities fully. The technocratic paradigm can permit a utilitarian vision of education that overlooks personal vocation and perpetuates a distorted vision of where we encounter her vision for education, the essential nature of woman is characterized as having qualities that present a direct contrast to the features of the technocratic paradigm. Though Stein does not herself use the term technocratic
paradigm, her description of the vices and structures that challenge the formation of women parallel the problems caused by the technocratic paradigm, such as a failure to
recognize the truth of creation, reductionism, and a lack of care for creation integrally understood. The gifts and virtues of women’s souls can be seen as a counter to the dangers of a technocratic era ‒ and perhaps by extension, a key to redeeming technology to a proper relationship with humanity, the created world, and the divine. This paper will first demonstrate the connections between Pope Francis’s portrayal of the technocratic paradigm from his encyclical Laudato Si’ and the threats and challenges to true education as described by Stein. Then, features of feminine nature that contrast with the technocratic paradigm will be described. Finally, suggestions are offered for a pedagogical approach that forms both men and women toward relationship with God rather than according to technocratic aims. Ultimately, Stein’s educational insights challenge a technocratic educational system and help students to unfold their authentic selves as gifts from God.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
18
Views
|
8
Downloads
|
|
26
Total
|
|
References
AI Research Group for the Centre for Digital Culture of the Dicastery for Culture and Education of the Holy See. (2024.) Encountering Artificial Intelligence: Ethical and Anthropological Investigations. Ed. Matthew J. Gaudet, Noreen Herzfeld, Paul Scherz, and Jordan J. Wales. Pickwick Publications.
Arendt, H. (2018.) The Human Condition. 2nd ed. University of Chicago Press.
Berdyaev, N. (1983.) “Man and Machine.” In Philosophy and Technology, edited by Carl Mitcham and Robert Mackey. Free Press., 203–11.
Borgman, A. (1987.) Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. University of Chicago Press., 155–249.
Choukas-Bradley, S., Roberts, S. R., Maheux, A. J., & Nesi, J. (2022.) The Perfect Storm: A Developmental Sociocultural Framework for the Role of Social Media in Adolescent Girls’ Body Image Concerns and Mental Health. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 25: 681–701.
Courtois, M. (2025.) “Among His Own Kin and in His Own House: Artificial Intelligence and the Interrelational Cultivation of Prudence.” Journal of Religious Ethics, 53 (2).
Courtois, M. (2022.) Biomedical Challenges to Identity and Parenthood: An Investigation into the Ethics of Genetic Technologies at the Beginning of Life. Ph.D. diss., The Catholic University of America.
Francis. (2016.) Amoris Lætitia. Vatican translation. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, AAS 100 (12).
Francis. Laudato Si’. Vatican translation. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2015, AAS 107.
Haidt, J. (2024.) The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness. Penguin Press.
Hanby, M. (2015.) The Gospel of Creation and the Technocratic Paradigm: Reflections on a Central Teaching of Laudato Si’. Communio: International Catholic Review, 42: 724–747.
John Paul II. (1981.) Laborem Exercens. Vatican translation. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, AAS 73.
McKenny, G. (2018.) Biotechnology, Human Nature, and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Papageorgiou, A., Cross, D., Fisher, C. (2023.) Sexualized Images on Social Media and Adolescent Girls’ Mental Health: Qualitative Insights from Parents, School Support Service Staff and Youth Mental Health Service Providers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20 (1): 433–450.
Ramelow, A. (2024.) Technology and Our Relationship with God. Nova et Vetera, 22 (1): 159–186.
Scherz, P. (2021.) The Challenge of Technology to Moral Theology. Journal of Moral Theology, 10(2): 239–268.
Scherz, P. (2024.) AI as Person, Paradigm, and Structure: Notes toward an Ethics of AI. Theological Studies 85 (1): 124–144.
Second Vatican Ecumenical Council. Gaudium et Spes: Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World. Vatican translation. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1966, 59: AAS 58.
Stein, E. (1996.) Die Frau: Ihre Aufgabe nach Natur und Gnade. Eds. L. Gelber and Romaeus Leuven. Edith Steins Werke V. Druten, Netherlands: De Maas & Waler. English transl. by Freds Mary Oben. 2nd and revised edition. The Collected Works of Edith Stein, vol. 2. ICS Publications.
Stein, E. (1993.) Selbstbildnis in Briefen (Self-Portrait in Letters): 1916–1942. Ed. L. Gelber, R. Leuven (Druten: De Maas & Waler, 1976–1977). English transl. by Josephine Koeppel. ICS Publications.
Stein, E. (1962.) Welt und Person. Werk VI. Nauwelaerts-Herder.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mariele Courtois
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The author reserves the rights (copyright) of the published works, and the journal encourages and allows their reuse, from the preprint. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under a license "Creative Commons Attribution / Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License - CC BY-NC 4.0", and can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited.
The author / s partially transfer the property rights (copyright) of this work for the printed and online editions, provided that:
- The authorship and original source of its publication (magazine, publisher and URL of the work) is cited.
- Are not used for commercial purposes.
- The existence and specifications of this user license are mentioned.
It also declares to have respected the ethical principles of research and to be free from any conflict of interest.
"C.P.E." encourages the authors and the scientific community to the maximum promotion and dissemination of the works in their final version through:
1) Your list of contacts (emails) and social networks (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn ...).
2) Institutional repository of your University and public repositories (Mendeley, Cosis ...).
3) Scientific social networks (ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Kudos ...).
4) Personal or institutional website, blog, etc.
5) Google Scholar, ORCID, ResearchID, ScopusID, Dimensions, PlumX ...
6) Printed copies purchased directly and sent to specialists for reading and subsequent citation if appropriate.
1.png)
1.png)
1.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
1.png)
1.png)
